Hazardous Waste Enforcement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Muscatine, Iowa Tank Car Company Enter into Expedited Settlement Agreement
August 07, 2026
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and Union Tank Car Company & Proctor Limited (“Union”) entered into a June 8th Expedited Settlement Agreement (“ESA”) addressing alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) hazardous waste regulations. See Docket No. RCRA-07-2026-0185.
The ESA provides that Union is the owner or operator of a facility in Muscatine, Iowa.
EPA is stated to have inspected the facility on December 11-12, 2025.
40 C.F.R. § 262.17(a) states that a large quantity generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for no more than ninety days without a permit or interim status provided all the conditions for exemption set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 262.17 are met. It is alleged that at the time of the inspection the following conditions were not met:
- Respondent failed to send off hazardous waste within 90 days after the satellite accumulation container became a hazardous waste accumulation container, as required by RCRA 3005.
- Respondent failed to conduct weekly inspections at its hazardous waste central accumulation area, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 262.17(a)(1)(v).
- Respondent failed to separate incompatible wastes, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 262.17(a)(1)(vii)(C).
- Respondent failed to mark or label the accumulation start date on (how many) hazardous waste accumulation containers, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 262.17(a)(5)(i)(C).
- Respondent failed to list hazardous waste management duties and responsibilities in written job descriptions, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 262.17(a)(7)(iv)(B).
- Because Respondent failed to comply with the generator requirements as set forth in paragraphs 3(a) - 3(b) above, Respondent was not authorized to accumulate hazardous waste at its facility for any length of time and therefore was operating a hazardous waste storage facility without a permit in violation of Section 3005 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6925.
Union neither admits nor denies the factual allegations contained in the ESA.
A civil penalty of $7,500 is assessed.
A copy of the ESA can be found here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.